Comment Re:Your hit piece on us is wrong!11! (Score 2) 105
I wasn't trolling, I was being mildly sarcastic.
I wasn't trolling, I was being mildly sarcastic.
The only reason why the truth isn't widely accepted by the sheeple is the constant MSM conditioning. If everyone knew what we know, the truth would be unstoppable.
That is why you cannot win against us in the Social Media, where our voice is strong.
Just think about it, does it make sense that they could shoot Princess Diana in that Mercedes, but could not manage another Moon landing since Armstrong?
we do not owe anything to Ukraine
"You" certainly recognized the borders of Ukraine in 2003.
Your president signed the law himself, here:
Or she's checking out how many times the name of her boss is in it - I hear he liked to use pseudonyms.
You're assuming due diligence will uncover fraud. That's false.
LOL. 6 hours to check out a company that HP was prepared to dump 8 billion 2012 dollars means only one thing - that HP didn't care.
Yeah, thanks for confirming what the article above said - that the company did not perform proper due diligence. This is how you pay more than you later think you should. Incidentally, the HP has not yet won. As your link mentions, the case will be appealed. Who knows the outcome?
EU doesn't have the obligations to Ukraine that the traitorous Trumpistan has.
Unlike the traitorous Trumpistan, the UK, which has the same obligations, has delivered.
See the difference?
Nah, your lot still believes NATO somehow cheated you out of the Soviet Union.
Hey, I heard Pam Blondy will be meeting Ghislaine Maxwell in prison.
Any idea why, when it was already declared the Epstein files are a hoax?
Hewlett-Packard carried out only six hours of due diligence on the finances of the British software company Autonomy before buying it for £8bn, in a deal that ended in disaster and a $5bn (£3.8bn) fraud case, according to court documents.
So, you do due diligence, you fire the guy who set up the deal, but you pay nevertheless, then it turns out there was more diligence due or perhaps you didn't manage to manage it so well, and then you sue, so that your failure becomes someone else's problem? Neat.
Of course.
I send 50 just to make sure they pay for it.
But we should listen to you instead?
Listen to whatever you want, it is a free world.
Should the pilot learn an interface that can lead them into a deadly error, or should a more appropriate redesign of a problematic interface be considered is an old argument, and an appropriate redesign has tended to lower the death toll.
this isn't some poorly-considered design fluke in the 787
Sure. The official document that asks the operators to change the buttons on this type of aircraft that I quoted is surely the work of some know-nothing Chicken Little and not an indication of a poorly considered feature.
We should always discard such documents and listen to the aviation "experts" on Slashdot. After all, they are not only great engineers, but also have a long history of polishing a pilot's armchair in their mom's basement.
Theoretically possible anytime and anywhere, but in this specific instance, as the UnknowinFool (whose username checks out so poorly) demonstrated, it apparently is not the case.
Amen, but there will never be enough pressure to push this through. And it will be a mess to enforce, and there will be deafening noise how it is "killing innovation". Well, some kinds of it for sure
Yeah, even considering that it happened a very long time ago.
Progress is wonderful.
Never buy what you do not want because it is cheap; it will be dear to you. -- Thomas Jefferson